中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

头臂血管转流并主动脉覆膜支架植入术在 Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层中的应用

查看全文

目的 评价头臂血管转流并主动脉覆膜支架植入术治疗 Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层的治疗效果。 方法 2013 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月期间我中心应用头臂血管转流并同期行覆膜支架植入手术技术治疗 Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层患者 49 例,其中男 33 例、女 16 例,平均年龄(60.4±5.5)岁。29 例行左颈总动脉-左锁骨下动脉人工血管转流术,18 例行右颈总动脉-左颈总动脉-左锁骨下动脉人工血管转流术,2 例行右颈总动脉-右锁骨下动脉转流+左颈总动脉-左锁骨下动脉人工血管转流术。 结果 全组患者术后 30 d 内死亡 1 例(2.0%),术后生存 48 例,随访率 100.0%(48/48),术后随访 6~47(26.8±11.9)个月,其中 1 例术后 6 个月再发胸痛,急诊复查全程主动脉血管造影 CT 提示逆撕 Stanford A1S 型夹层,行外科手术,效果满意。全组存活患者未发生内漏。 结论 头臂血管转流并同期行主动脉覆膜支架植入手术治疗 Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层患者是安全有效的。

Objective To evaluate the results of a hybrid procedure for treating Stanford type B1C aortic dissection. Methods In our center, 49 patients with Stanford type B1C aortic dissection underwent supra-arch branch vessel bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) from December 2013 to December 2017. There were 33 males and 16 females with an average age of 60.4±5.5 years. Left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery bypass (n=29), right common carotid artery to left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery bypass (n=18), left common carotid artery to left subclavian artery and right common carotid artery to right subclavian artery bypass (n=2) were performed. Results Early mortality rate was 2.0% (1/49). Forty-eight patients survived postoperatively. The follow-up rate was 100.0% (48/48). The patients were followed up for 6 to 47 (26.8±11.9) months postoperatively. Chest pain relapsed in one patient 8 months after the operation. The whole aorta CTA showed type A1S aortic dissection in one patient 6 months after the operation, and the re-operation was satisfactory. There was no endoleak or paraplegia. Conclusion Initial results suggest that the one-stage hybrid procedure is a suitable therapeutic option for type B1C aortic dissection.

关键词: Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层; 头臂血管转流; 杂交手术; 覆膜支架

Key words: Type B1C aortic dissection; supra-arch branch vessel bypass; hybrid procedure; stent graft

引用本文: 崔聪, 张力, 高夏, 张向辉, 孙科雄, 肖长波, 武刚, 马伸, 陈玉新, 王平凡. 头臂血管转流并主动脉覆膜支架植入术在 Stanford B1C 型主动脉夹层中的应用. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2019, 26(2): 121-124. doi: 10.7507/1007-4848.201805006 复制

登录后 ,请手动点击刷新查看图表内容。 没有账号,
1. 饶从亮, 胡何节, 王晓天, 等. 亚急性期 Stanford B 型主动脉夹层腔内隔绝术后主动脉重塑的特点及影响因素. 中国普通外科杂志, 2017, 26(12): 1547-1554.
2. Mitchell RS, Ishimaru S, Ehrlich MP, et al. First International Summit on Thoracic Aortic Endografting: roundtable on thoracic aortic dissection as an indication for endografting. J Endovasc Ther, 2002, 9(Suppl 2): I98-I105.
3. 冯俊波, 葛圣林, 周汝元, 等. " 一站式”杂交手术及单纯腔内隔绝术治疗 Stanford B 型主动脉夹层. 安徽医学, 2015, 36(4): 476-478.
4. Antoniou GA, El Sakka K, Hamady M, et al. Hybrid treatment of complex aortic arch disease with supra-aortic debranching and endovascular stent graft repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2010, 39(6): 683-690.
5. 范海伦, 汤凯丰, 胡凡果, 等. 体外开窗 TEVAR 技术治疗不良近端锚定区 Stanford B 型主动脉夹层的近期疗效分析. 血管与腔内血管外科杂志, 2016, 2(5): 415-419.
6. 舒畅, 王暾. " 烟囱”技术治疗累及弓部分支动脉病变中远期疗效研究. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(12): 1163-1166.
7. Yuri K, Yokoi Y, Yamaguchi A, et al. Usefulness of fenestrated stent grafts for thoracic aortic aneurysms. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2013, 44(4): 760-767.
8. Appoo JJ, Tse LW, Pozeg ZI, et al. Thoracic aortic frontier: review of current applications and directions of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Can J Cardiol, 2014, 30(1): 52-63.
9. Milewski RK, Szeto WY, Pochettino A, et al. Have hybrid procedures replaced open aortic arch reconstruction in high-risk patients? A comparative study of elective open arch debranching with endovascular stent graft placement and conventional elective open total and distal aortic arch reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010, 140(3): 590-597.
10. Sood V, Patel HJ, Williams DM, et al. Open and endovascular repair of the nontraumatic isolated aortic arch aneurysm. J Vasc Surg, 2014, 60(1): 57-63.
11. Bavaria J, Vallabhajosyula P, Moeller P, et al. Hybrid approaches in the treatment of aortic arch aneurysms: postoperative and midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2013, 145(3 Suppl): S85-S90.
12. Ozsvath KJ, Roddy SP, Darling RC 3rd, et al. Carotid-carotid crossover bypass: is it a durable procedure? J Vasc Surg, 2003, 37(3): 582-585.
13. 魏以桢, 常谦, 于存涛, 等. 一期杂交手术治疗累及主动脉弓远端的降主动脉病变. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2011, 18(2): 99-103.
14. Grabenwöger M, Alfonso F, Bachet J, et al. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) for the treatment of aortic diseases: a position statement from the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), in collaboration with the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2012, 42(1): 17-24.
15. Pepper J. Differential aspects of the disease and treatment of Thoracic Acute Aortic Dissection (TAAD)-the European experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 5(4): 360-367.
16. Preventza O, Coselli JS. Differential aspects of ascending thoracic aortic dissection and its treatment: the North American experience. Ann Cardiothorac Surg, 2016, 5(4): 352-359.
17. Dijkstra ML, Vainas T, Zeebregts CJ, et al. Editor’s choice - spinal cord ischaemia in endovascular thoracic and thoraco-abdominal aortic repair: review of preventive strategies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2018, 55(6): 829-841.
18. Bozso SJ, White A, Nagendran J, et al. Hybrid aortic arch and frozen elephant trunk reconstruction: bridging the gap between conventional and total endovascular arch repair. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther, 2018, 16(3): 209-217.
19. Ullery BW, Cheung AT, Fairman RM, et al. Risk factors, outcomes, and clinical manifestations of spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 54(3): 677-684.
20. Jayia P, Constantinou J, Hamilton H, et al. Temporary perfusion branches to decrease spinal cord ischemia in the endovascular treatment of thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms: based on a presentation at the 2013 VEITH Symposium, November 19-23, 2013 (New York, NY, USA). Aorta (Stamford), 2015, 3(2): 56-60.